Just a thought, wouldn't it be nice if InjectObject by default injected  
the service with an id equal to the return type's fully qualified name?


@InjectObject
public abstract MyService getMyService();

would be the same as

@InjectObject("service:my.package.MyService")
public abstract MyService getMyService();


At least for me the type's name is equal to the service id about 99% of  
the time. What do you think?.

--Martin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jaka...
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jaka...