opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

r : rpc-dev@xml.apache.org 21 January 2005 • 12:56AM -0500

RE: Status of apache xmlrpc
by Thomas Smallwood

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP





So any libraries built to implement xml-rpc are probably pretty stable,
ie. they won't be changing to comply with a changing spec. Thanks for
clarifying that.

My next question will probably result in subjective responses but I'll
ask it anyway: Is XML-RPC still a viable/reasonable solution for
client/server communication or has it been replaced by something new and
better?

Obviously SOAP is the follow on to xml-rpc but we like the simplicity of
xml-rpc and it appears to satisfy our requirements. Is there anything
else we should be looking at in the xml-rpc'ish realm?

tds

  

Phone:  303.442.3813 x577

Fax:  303.442.3846

tsmallwood@webr...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jochen Wiedmann [mailto:jochen.wiedmann@gmai...]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 2:10 PM
> To: xmlrpc-dev@ws.a...
> Subject: Re: Status of apache xmlrpc
>
> Thomas Smallwood wrote:
>
> > Sorry to bother anybody, but would somebody be able to tell me the
> > status of the xmlrpc project. Is it on-going and alive or has it
ground
> > to a halt with no further development likely?
>
> As the XML-RPC spec won't change and the committers have (AFAIK)
refused
> anything, that might extend the SPEC, it is (IMO) halted. At least, I
> cannot remember serious changes in the past months.
>
>
> Jochen



Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.