> On Jul 7, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>> <<On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 16:17:53 -0700, Doug Barton <dougb@free...> said:
>>> BIND in the base today comes with a full-featured local resolver
>>> configuration, which I'm confident that Dag-Erling can do for unbound
>>> (and which I would be glad to assist with if needed). Other than that,
>>> what integration are you concerned about?
>> The utilities (specifically host(1) and dig(1)) are the only
>> user-visible interfaces I care about. I don't see any need for there
>> to be an authoritative name server in the base system. So long as the
>> resolver works properly and does DNSsec validation....
> The only reason I want it in the base system is that ports don't cross build very well, but the base system does. That's a weak +1 for keeping something in the base system, but I'll be the first to admit it is a second or third tier argument at best.
The real reason you want exactly these tools in base is that otherwise you
end up rewriting tiny parts of freebsd-update etc that actually depend on
host, etc. to query SRV for SRV records.
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!