Since I have been behaving exceptionally well I am pretty sure Santa
is going to drop the requested stuff down the chimney. I have been a
little lazy about sending my letter to the North Pole because of the
dilemma I am in.
I am a proud owner of an EOS 20D and use it for portraits, kids sports
a few landscapes.
I need your expertise to help resolve which lens out of
EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM OR
EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM
will make more sense for me:
* The 70-200mm (112-320mm for 20D) does not sound as useful as 28-300mm
(45-480mm for 20D)
* The F 2.8 of the 70-200 lens may be more useful than the F 3.5-5.6 of
the 28-300 lens.
* The 28-300mm costs $500 to $600 more.
I have heard a lot more about the 70-200mm than the 28-300mm - does the
70-200 so much
sharper resolution that it will beat 28-300 hands down ?
The links and price for the lenses is given below.
Zoom Telephoto EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS Image Stabilizer USM Autofocus Lens