Since I have been behaving exceptionally well I am pretty sure Santa
is going to drop the requested stuff down the chimney. I have been a
little lazy about sending my letter to the North Pole because of the
dilemma I am in.


I am a proud owner of an EOS 20D and use it for portraits, kids sports
and
a few landscapes.

I need your expertise to help resolve which lens out of
EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM      OR
EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM
will make more sense for me:

* The 70-200mm (112-320mm for 20D) does not sound as useful as 28-300mm
(45-480mm for 20D)
* The F 2.8 of the 70-200 lens may be more useful than the F 3.5-5.6 of
the 28-300 lens.
* The 28-300mm costs $500 to $600 more.

I have heard a lot more about the 70-200mm than the 28-300mm - does the
70-200 so much
sharper resolution that it will beat 28-300 hands down ?


The links and price for the lenses is given below.

Zoom Telephoto EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS Image Stabilizer USM Autofocus Lens


<http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/234444-USA/Canon_7042A002_70_200m
m_f_2_8L_IS_USM.html>  
Price: $1,699.00
Instant Rebate:  -$125.00
After Rebate: $1,574.00



Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto EF 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM Autofocus Lens


<http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/319784-USA/Canon_9322A002_28_300m
m_f_3_5_5_6L_IS_USM.html>
Price: $2,199.00


Thanks for your help.


Regards,

Sarbjit Singh                      
Design Technical Operations       Phone: 313-805-7822
LVC STUDIO, BUILDING # 2, MEZZANINE - 2M-H27.

*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************