> Speaking of changes to emacs-24, may I ask why the bugfix for
> bug#11374 has been committed to the release branch? It is not a
> regression, and though it fixes a real bug, that bug has never been
> reported in more than five years, not even in bug#11374, which is
> just the result of a survey of strncpy calls in the sources, I think.
> The fix is relatively small, but not trivial enough that it couldn't
> hide another bug in what is a crucial part of emacsclient.c.
Hmm, it is a corner case. I thought Jim's fix seemed pretty
self-contained and clear, and it's always good to avoid buffer
overflows. But indeed it's not a regression. So if you guys object to
it, I don't mind reverting the commit.