Dale Newfield wrote:
> I have no idea.  I was just throwing out random theories of what might
> have been causing this guy grief.  Since he was getting a valid value
> for this attribute ("[]" although he was expecting "['TEST1', 'TEST2']")
> I think I'm wrong here.  Sounds like you *know* that I'm wrong here, so
> I'll withdraw the idea as bone-headed :-)  (But if the action class is
> somehow hidden in his call stack by a proxy class through AOP or
> something, maybe?)

I don't *know* you're wrong, it would just really, really surprise me :)
But yeah, like Musachy said, I reckon some twisty stuff could happen if
there was junk trying to layer on top of it--not really sure though.

Dave


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@stru...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@stru...