opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

c : cybercrime-alerts@freelists.org 5 November 2004 • 10:16AM -0500

Spammer Gets Slammer
by cybercrime-alerts

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP





Spammer Gets Slammer
By Roy Mark
November 4, 2004


A jury in Virginia recommended a nine-year prison term Wednesday afternoon
for the first U.S. felony conviction of a spammer. Jeremy Jaynes of Raleigh,
N.C., was convicted on three counts of using deceptive routing information
in sending bulk commercial e-mail.

Under Virginia's anti-spam law, which went into effect in April 2003,
spammers living outside of the state can be charged, even if none of the
recipients live in Virginia, as long as the e-mail was routed through
Virginia. More than half of the world's e-mail flows through Virginia, home
of America Online and numerous federal agencies.

According to the evidence presented at the trial, Jaynes, 30, and his
sister, Jessica DeGroot, grossed more than $24 million in various e-mail
scams. The jury spared DeGroot, 28, jail time but fined her $7,500. A third
defendant, Richard Rutkowski, 30, was acquitted.

Circuit Court Judge Thomas Horne will formally sentence Jaynes and DeGroot
in February. Horne may reduce the sentence or follow the jury's
recommendation, but he cannot increase the penalties.

At the time of Jaynes' arrest, the Spamhaus database listed Jaynes and
Rutkowski as a "non-stop group of porn spammers" who use their high-speed
T-1 Internet connections for sending "notorious 'horsey porn' spam."

Commonwealth of Virginia prosecutor Gene Fishel presented evidence that
Jaynes also used e-mail to peddle a fraudulent home business, which in one
month alone brought in 10,000 credit card orders for the $39.95 scheme.

The volume of the mailings triggered the criminal provisions of the Virginia
law. The indictment, which covers a 30-day period in the summer of 2003,
charged that Jaynes and his associates sent more than 10,000 pieces of spam
a day and more than 100,000 for the period.

Jaynes and DeGroot are expected to appeal their convictions on the grounds
that the Virginia law is an unconstitutional infringement of free speech.

--
Articles distributed for the purposes of education, discussion and review.

Archives and Subscription Updates: http://cybercrime.theMezz.com
Guestbook: http://guestbook.theMezz.com
PGP Key: http://pgp.theMezz.com






Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.