opensubscriber
   Find in this group all groups
 
Unknown more information…

b : bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org 10 August 2011 • 3:54PM -0400

Re: [Bridge] possible bridge regression in "bridge: implement [add/del]_slave ops"?
by Weirich, Bernhard

REPLY TO AUTHOR
 
REPLY TO GROUP




Hello,

I had trouble with the new detection code for interface ports.
In turned out that the carrier was down, but IFF_RUNNING was set.
I changed the code to check for IFF_UP & IFF_LOWER_UP for interface ports and now it works the way it should.
Would it be better to check IFF_LOWER_UP or is my interface device driver incorrect?

Best regards,
Bernhard


----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linu...>
Subject: Re: [Bridge] possible bridge regression in "bridge: implement
        [add/del]_slave ops"?
To: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@syst...>
Cc: netdev@vger..., bridge@list...,  "David
        S. Miller" <davem@dave...>, linux-kernel@vger...
Message-ID: <20110705142858.3b7e5941@neha...>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

I just put a fix for the detection of bridge pseudo-device being up
into the current rstp code available at:
  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shemminger/rstp.git


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
Bridge@list...
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge

End of Bridge Digest, Vol 95, Issue 3
*************************************
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
Bridge@list...
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge

Bookmark with:

Delicious   Digg   reddit   Facebook   StumbleUpon

Related Messages

opensubscriber is not affiliated with the authors of this message nor responsible for its content.