> Yes exactly. That can be done. We can use some other charactor like
> '-' to represent '/' charactors in the service name. That will avoid
> most of the logics I've added to properly handle this. I can resend a
> pathc using '-' if we can agree on that.
Then you do not need to anything ? I mean no code changes for
dispatching ;-) .
Second if you can see whether to create a new deployer to handle the
hierachical service, then people who need that feature can use that, so
will not break anything.